Skip to content
Yucca Schidigera · Aquaculture

Yucca schidigera in aquaculture, in feed and in water

In aquaculture, yucca can be supplied in two ways. Incorporated into feed, it acts on the nitrogen metabolism of the fish; added to the rearing water, it tackles dissolved ammonia directly. This page brings together the published trials in fish and shrimp.

Background

Ammonia, the primary limiting factor in intensive farming

The higher the stocking density, the more nitrogen accumulates in the water: faeces, uneaten feed and organic matter release ammonia. In its toxic form, it damages the gills, disrupts osmoregulation and weakens the immune system, resulting in reduced appetite, slower growth and mortalities.

Water exchange, oxygenation, biological filtration or suspending feeding remain the conventional levers. Yucca is being studied as a natural complement, in open ponds and recirculating systems alike, and in combination with biofloc systems.

Aerial view of aquaculture ponds with aerators
Water chemistry

What proportion of ammonia is toxic?

Total ammonia nitrogen is divided between the ammonium ion (NH₄⁺), which has low toxicity, and un-ionised ammonia (NH₃), which is toxic. This distribution depends on the pH and temperature of the water. Adjust both to see the toxic fraction.

3.7% of total ammonia nitrogen in the toxic form (NH₃)
Toxic NH₃ NH₄⁺ ammonium

That is 6.1 times more than at pH 7 at the same temperature. For 2 mg/L of total ammonia nitrogen, this represents 0.07 mg/L of NH₃.

Link with yucca: in European sea bass, the extract added to the water lowered the pH, which probably reduces the NH₃ fraction [4][3]. Calculation based on Emerson et al., 1975 [16], in freshwater.

Trial results

Two delivery routes, two sets of results

Incorporated into feed, yucca acts on nitrogen metabolism: less nitrogen and ammonia released by the fish, and often better growth and better feed efficiency. Doses are expressed in mg or as a % of the feed.

Pangasius
Pangasianodon hypophthalmus
0.075 – 0.15% 12 wk
At 0.15%: higher specific growth, lower feed conversion ratio, less ammonia nitrogen excreted, higher haematocrit and haemoglobin.[2]
Channel catfish
Ictalurus punctatus
0.5 – 1.0 g/kg 12 wk
Lower faecal nitrogen and ammonia excretion with yucca; higher weight gain in fry fed 1.0 g/kg.[1]
Mirror carp
Cyprinus carpio
200 – 400 mg/kg 8 wk
Higher final weight at 400 mg/kg; increased lysozyme and complement, decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines, better intestinal antioxidant status.[5]
European sea bass
Dicentrarchus labrax
0.25 – 1.0 g/kg 45 d
Improved weight and feed conversion ratio, especially at 1.0 g/kg.[14]
Nile tilapia
Oreochromis niloticus
0.1 – 2% 10 wk
Yucca meal at 0.1%: better growth, higher lysozyme and phagocyte respiratory burst activity, better resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila.[8]
Pacific white shrimp
Litopenaeus vannamei
0.1 – 0.3% 100 d
At 0.2%: better growth, enhanced non-specific immunity and better rearing water quality.[7]
Pacific white shrimp, yucca + quillaja
Litopenaeus vannamei, low-salinity water
0.25 – 2 g/kg 40 d
Higher weight and lower feed conversion ratio at 1 and 2 g/kg.[11]
Tilapia, yucca + quillaja
Oreochromis niloticus
150 + 150 mg/kg 6 wk
Higher growth; after hypoxic stress, survival 22% higher than in the control (11% with yucca alone).[12]
Two trials in detail

In catfish, less nitrogen released

Güroy et al., 2014 [2]

Pangasius

Pangasianodon hypophthalmus

Juveniles of 1.78 g, 15 fish per 80 L tank, 3 replicates, freshwater recirculating system at 29.7 °C, 12 weeks. Fishmeal-based feed, with 0 to 0.15% yucca extract.

Doses tested
0% Control
0.075% n.s.
0.1% n.s.
0.15% Best level
P < 0.05 Higher specific growth rate at 0.15% than with the control feed.
P < 0.05 Lower feed conversion ratio at 0.15% than with the control and 0.075%.
↓ Less total ammonia nitrogen excreted at high inclusion levels.
P < 0.05 Higher haematocrit and haemoglobin at 0.15%.
n.s. Biometric indices and body composition unchanged.
Kelly & Kohler, 2003 [1]

Channel catfish

Ictalurus punctatus

Post-yolk-sac fry and juveniles fed for 12 weeks with 0, 0.5 or 1.0 g of yucca extract per kg of feed, agar-coated for the fry. Hybrid tilapia was also studied.

Doses tested
0 Control
0.5 g/kg Nitrogen ↓
1.0 g/kg Nitrogen ↓, growth ↑
P < 0.05 Lower faecal nitrogen with yucca, with no difference between 0.5 and 1.0 g/kg.
P < 0.05 Lower ammonia excretion than in the control group.
P < 0.05 Higher weight gain in fry fed 1.0 g/kg, the only group to differ from the control.
P < 0.05 More protein and less lipid in body composition.
Modes of action

What happens in the water, and in the fish

The review by Paray et al. (2021) distinguishes between a direct effect on water quality and indirect effects on growth and immunity.

In the water Ammonia binding
The steroidal saponin fractions, which are surfactants, bind to ammonia through their glycosidic components. A conversion of ammonia into nitrite and nitrate has also been suggested.[3][10]
In the water pH reduction
In European sea bass, the extract added to the water lowered the pH. And the toxic fraction of ammonia decreases as the pH falls (see the simulator).[4]
In the fish Nitrogen metabolism
Less faecal nitrogen and ammonia excreted, more protein retained: the fish spends less energy balancing its protein metabolism.[1][2][3]
In the fish Intestinal immunity
Increased lysozyme and complement, decreased pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6); better resistance to certain pathogenic bacteria.[5][8]
In the fish Antioxidant defences
Increased SOD, CAT and GPx activities and decreased malondialdehyde. The phenolic compounds in yucca, including resveratrol, are thought to contribute to this.[5][6]
In the system Ponds, recirculating systems and biofloc
The results apply to open ponds and closed systems alike; yucca is presented as complementary to biofloc technology.[3]
Dose and safety

A window of use to be respected

Saponins are active at low doses and harmful at high doses. According to the review by Paray et al., moderate levels promote growth, whereas high levels can cause enteritis. The dose also depends on the species and on the saponin content of the product.

Favourable

Pangasius 1.5 g/kg
Improved growth, feed conversion ratio and nitrogen excretion.[2]
Nile tilapia 0.1%
Better growth and better disease resistance.[8]
European sea bass, in water 0.75 mg/L
Reduced ammonia, improved survival and blood parameters.[4]

No measurable effect

Pangasius 0.75 – 1 g/kg
Growth not different from the control.[2]
Infected tilapia 0.14 – 0.2%
No growth improvement at the high doses, unlike at 0.1%.[15]
Japanese flounder 1.5 g/kg
Growth unchanged, despite improved immunity and survival.[17]

Unfavourable

Channel catfish 1.1 g/kg
Lower weight and higher feed conversion ratio.[9]
Carp, saponins in water 1,000 ppm
Death of all fish within 18 hours with yucca saponins.[3]
High saponin levels Feed
Risk of enteritis, whereas moderate levels promote growth.[3]

The same order of dose can be favourable in one species and unfavourable in another: 1.5 g/kg improves growth in pangasius, whereas 1.1 g/kg reduces it in channel catfish. Hence the importance of validating the dose by species and by product.

Form and inclusion

Yucca Schidigera, powder or liquid

The powder form is incorporated into feed; the liquid form disperses rapidly in the rearing water. The choice depends on the species, the system (pond, recirculating system, biofloc) and the logistics of the farm. The quality of a product is judged by its saponin content.

View the Yucca Schidigera range Quillaja Saponaria
Frequently asked questions

Yucca in aquaculture

Should it be supplied in the feed or in the water?

Both routes are documented. In feed, yucca acts mainly on the nitrogen metabolism and growth of the fish; in water, it acts directly on dissolved ammonia. The choice depends on the species, the rearing system and its logistics.

Can it replace water exchange or oxygenation?

No. Yucca is a complement to the conventional levers (water exchange, oxygenation, biological filtration), not a substitute. It helps to control ammonia without removing the need for good water management.

Can a large amount be used to get results faster?

No. Saponins become harmful at high doses: in water, 1,000 ppm of yucca saponins killed carp within 18 hours, and high levels in feed can cause enteritis. The published effective doses are much lower: a few tenths of a mg per litre of water, or of the order of one gram per kg of feed.

Is it compatible with a biofloc system?

The review by Paray et al. (2021) presents yucca as complementary to biofloc technology. Monitoring of water parameters is still recommended when it is introduced.

How can two yucca-based products be compared?

By their saponin content, which drives the effect on ammonia, rather than by their yucca content. Actifeed guarantees a consistent content from one batch to the next and specifies the doses for its range in the technical data sheet.

References

Scientific literature

  1. Kelly A.M., Kohler C.C. (2003). Effects of Yucca shidigera extract on growth, nitrogen retention, ammonia excretion, and toxicity in channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus and hybrid tilapia Oreochromis mossambicus × O. niloticus. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 34(2), 156-161. doi:10.1111/j.1749-7345.2003.tb00052.x
  2. Güroy B., Mantoğlu S., Kayalı S., Şahin İ. (2014). Effect of dietary Yucca schidigera extract on growth, total ammonia–nitrogen excretion and haematological parameters of juvenile striped catfish Pangasianodon hypophthalmus. Aquaculture Research, 45(4), 647-654. doi:10.1111/are.12001
  3. Paray B.A., El-Basuini M.F., Alagawany M., Albeshr M.F., Farah M.A., Dawood M.A.O. (2021). Yucca schidigera usage for healthy aquatic animals: potential roles for sustainability. Animals, 11(1), 93. doi:10.3390/ani11010093
  4. Fayed W.M., Khalil R.H., Sallam G.R., Mansour A.T., Elkhayat B.K., Omar E.A. (2019). Estimating the effective level of Yucca schidigera extract for improvement of the survival, haematological parameters, immunological responses and water quality of European seabass juveniles (Dicentrarchus labrax). Aquaculture Reports, 15, 100208.
  5. Wang L. et al. (2020). Effect of Yucca schidigera extract on the growth performance, intestinal antioxidant status, immune response, and tight junctions of mirror carp (Cyprinus carpio). Fish & Shellfish Immunology, 103, 211-219.
  6. Abdel-Tawwab M., Mounes H.A., Shady S.H., Ahmed K.M. (2021). Effects of yucca, Yucca schidigera, extract and/or yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as water additives on growth, biochemical, and antioxidants/oxidant biomarkers of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture, 533, 736122.
  7. Yang Q.-H., Tan B.-P., Dong X.-H., Chi S.-Y., Liu H.-Y. (2015). Effects of different levels of Yucca schidigera extract on the growth and nonspecific immunity of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) and on culture water quality. Aquaculture, 439, 39-44.
  8. Njagi G.W., Lee S., Won S., Hong J., Bai S.C., Hamidoghli A. (2017). Effects of dietary Yucca meal on growth, haematology, non-specific immune responses and disease resistance of juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture Research, 48, 4399-4408.
  9. Tidwell J.H., Webster C.D., Clark J.A., Yancey D.H. (1992). Effects of Yucca shidigera extract on water quality and fish growth in recirculating-water aquaculture systems. Progressive Fish-Culturist, 54, 196-201.
  10. Santacruz-Reyes R.A., Chien Y.-H. (2010). Ammonia reduction in seawater by Yucca schidigera extract: efficacy analysis and empirical modelling. Aquaculture Research, 41, 1221-1228.
  11. Hernández Acosta M. et al. (2016). The effects of Yucca schidigera and Quillaja saponaria on growth performance and enzymes activities of juvenile shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei cultured in low salinity water. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, 44(1), 121-128.
  12. Angeles I.P. Jr., Gallego L.M., Navarro M.A.M., Chien Y.-H. (2017). Dietary effects of Quillaja saponaria and Yucca schidigera extract on rearing performance of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and its antioxidant capacity and metabolic response following hypoxic stress. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 13, 2249-2266.
  13. Yeh S.-P., Liu C.-H., Sung T.-G., Lee P.-P., Cheng W. (2006). Effect of saponin on hematological and immunological parameters of the giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Aquaculture, 261, 1432-1439.
  14. Elkhayat B., Mansour A., Fayed W., Omar E., Nour A.A. (2019). The effect of Yucca schidigera extract dietary supplementation on growth performance, feed and protein utilization of European seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax, fingerlings. Egyptian Journal of Aquaculture, 9, 15-31.
  15. El-Keredy M.S.A., Naena N.A.A. (2020). Yucca plant as treatment for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Nile tilapia farms with emphasis on its effect on growth performance. Alexandria Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 66, 64.
  16. Emerson K., Russo R.C., Lund R.E., Thurston R.V. (1975). Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 32(12), 2379-2383.
  17. Bae J. et al. (2020). Evaluation of seven different functional feed additives in a low fish meal diet for olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus. Aquaculture, 525, 735333.
Other species Ruminants Pigs Poultry
Request information